Texas A&M-CC
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,133  Fabian Lutz SR 33:56
1,175  Cesar Gonzalez SR 33:58
1,265  Jordan Wright JR 34:05
1,327  Marek Spriesterbach FR 34:11
1,620  Vinnie Van Puyvelde SR 34:35
1,731  Steven Galli JR 34:44
1,889  Jan Anstett SO 34:58
2,070  Jeff Lopez FR 35:17
2,678  Dominc Baptiste FR 36:58
National Rank #193 of 312
South Central Region Rank #17 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 16th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 1.5%
Top 20 in Regional 98.7%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Fabian Lutz Cesar Gonzalez Jordan Wright Marek Spriesterbach Vinnie Van Puyvelde Steven Galli Jan Anstett Jeff Lopez Dominc Baptiste
Texas A&M Invitational 09/24 1171 34:05 33:52 33:36 33:42 35:10 33:44 36:07
Southland Conference Championships 10/28 1199 34:34 33:32 34:09 35:12 34:32 33:55 34:35 36:57
South Central Region Championships 11/11 1206 33:39 34:10 33:57 34:12 35:01





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 15.6 432 0.1 0.3 1.2 2.5 5.3 11.1 12.7 14.5 16.5 14.1 11.7 7.0 2.1 1.1 0.2 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Fabian Lutz 73.9
Cesar Gonzalez 76.0
Jordan Wright 81.9
Marek Spriesterbach 87.5
Vinnie Van Puyvelde 106.4
Steven Galli 113.8
Jan Anstett 124.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 0.1% 0.1 8
9 0.3% 0.3 9
10 1.2% 1.2 10
11 2.5% 2.5 11
12 5.3% 5.3 12
13 11.1% 11.1 13
14 12.7% 12.7 14
15 14.5% 14.5 15
16 16.5% 16.5 16
17 14.1% 14.1 17
18 11.7% 11.7 18
19 7.0% 7.0 19
20 2.1% 2.1 20
21 1.1% 1.1 21
22 0.2% 0.2 22
23 0.1% 0.1 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0